The inspector general report on the 2016 election doesn’t vindicate Trump on anything. He’s sure it does.
So many lies, so little time.
President Donald Trump went on Fox & Friends
to talk about the inspector general report on the FBI’s handling of the
2016 election on Friday. His comments contained at least four
significant and demonstrable lies.
Let’s go through them.
Lie one: the FBI was working against him during the campaign
“They were plotting against my election,” Trump said, in perhaps the biggest of the four lies.
This
is not true. Inspector General Michael Horowitz was quite clear on this
point in the report, which reviewed the FBI’s handling of both the
Clinton email investigation and the early stages of the Trump-Russia
probe. “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that
improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the
specific investigative decisions we reviewed,” Horowitz concluded.
Trump
did eventually confront this uncomfortable fact during the interview.
He claimed the no bias conclusion was irresponsible, a throwaway line at
the end of the report.
Lie two: the IG “blew it” by concluding the FBI wasn’t biased
“It was a pretty good report, and then I say the IG blew it at the end,” Trump told Fox’s Steve Doocy. The IG report was a horror show. I thought that one sentence of conclusion was ridiculous.”
The
conclusion said that the FBI wasn’t biased was not a throwaway
conclusion at the end of the report, but a conclusion that’s examined
in-depth and repeated with some frequency throughout the report.
Chapters five and 12 of the more than 500-page report, for example, look
at anti-Trump text messages sent by Peter Strzok, the FBI’s deputy
director for counter-intelligence, to see if Strzok had allowed his
anti-Trump sentiments to affect the investigation.
Investigators
took a deep look at Strzok’s conduct after they came across the texts
that seemingly threatened the Trump campaign and examined internal FBI
records of the meetings concerning Trump that Strzok was involved in.
According to Horowitz, they found that “Strzok was not the sole
decisionmaker for any of the specific investigative decisions examined,”
nor was there any evidence that he exercised inappropriate influence
over any investigative decisions.
The conclusion that there was no
bias, in short, wasn’t “one line” — but rather a conclusion they
arrived at after examining a tremendous amount of evidence, and a major
focus of the report.
Lie three: Trump says the IG report says he did nothing wrong
The
third Trump lie is that the IG report somehow exonerated him on the
question of collusion with Russia during the campaign. “I did nothing
wrong, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. The IG report
yesterday went a long way to show that,” Trump said. “I think that the
Mueller investigation has been totally discredited.”
This is
actually a number of different lies packed into three short sentences; a
Russian nesting doll of lies, if you’ll pardon the metaphor.
The IG report did notcome
to any conclusions about the true nature of Trump-Russia ties. It only
covered the appropriateness of the FBI’s conduct in 2016. It couldn’t
come to any conclusions about obstruction of justice because Trump
didn’t become president until 2017. Likewise, it couldn’t discredit the
Mueller investigation because Mueller didn’t take over the investigation
until President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey last May.
Lie four: James Comey is a criminal
And
that brings us to our final lie. Fox’s Doocy asked Trump a leading
question — “Should James Comey be locked up?” — and the president
responded as expected:
Certainly, they just seem like very criminal acts to me. What he did was criminal. What he did was so bad in terms of our Constitution, in terms of the well-being of our country.
President @realDonaldTrump comments after DOJ IG report finds Comey was “insubordinate” pic.twitter.com/nWWRQ5u5hr
— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) June 15, 2018
In fact, the report concludes, Comey’s
decisions during the Clinton email investigation, while questionable,
came from his professional judgment and were not the result of any
malign intent.
“Comey’s decision was the result of his
consideration of the evidence that the FBI had collected during the
course of the investigation and his understanding of the proof required
to pursue a prosecution under the relevant statutes,” as Horowitz puts
it when discussing his closing of the Clinton email case.
Trump’s characterization of the IG report is thus basically wrong in every way.
COMMENTS